15 Most Recent [RSS]
More...
|
Ego surfing...
Mike recently used EgoSurf to generate some notoriety number. Here's mine:
Since this changes, let me make a note here, that of 2006-07-21, 10:42am it was 2424. Let's see how it develops. :-)
Stephane writes: Is is better to have a lower score or higher score? I tried it and scored 6993.
|
Uli Kusterer writes: I have no idea what the various numbers mean. On the first page (with the speedometer-type animation) I got an incredibly high number (somewhere in the 6000s), on the HTML and on subsequent calls to the same search I got a lower number, and since I posted it this morning the number has about halved.
The progression of numbers looks as if I was burning karma at a vastly accelerated rate, or I'm on a steep rise to popularity ... no idea. Fun idea and plaything, though.
|
Ruth Less writes: Hah, if bigger is better, I am naturally cooler than Uli: 2366 ("fair") today! *jumps up and down* :-P
There seems to be a healthy amount of randomness involved on the side of the page owner however... "Egopoints now biodegrade. They have an atomic half-life"... Don't call the page to often and be happy with the first results, I think that's the message... |
| |